When water pipes start to fail, building owners face two main options; full re-piping or epoxy pipe coating. Both aim to solve aging pipe problems, but they differ significantly in safety, lifespan, and long-term value.
Most older buildings have pipes that are corroded or simply too small in diameter for modern water demand. The result is excessive flow rates, leaks, and rising repair costs. When this happens, a real solution is needed and not a temporary fix.
Re-piping means removing old pipes entirely and installing new ones throughout the building. Walls and ceilings are opened up, old pipes are pulled out, new pipes are run through the walls and ceilings of all units, the walls are repaired, and the system is pressure-tested then inspected by the City before sign-off.
New plumbing materials include stainless steel and/or PEX, both of which are durable and corrosion-resistant. The result is a fully compliant and inspected brand-new plumbing system with pipe diameter installed to new code, guaranteed water pressure, and a newly expected lifespan of 50 plus years. These new systems are reviewed and accepted by insurers and municipalities.
Epoxy coating takes a different approach; rather than replacing pipes, a thin epoxy is sprayed inside piping after it has been cleaned and dried. The old pipes stay in place, now epoxy lined on the interior.
It’s often marketed as a faster and less inexpensive installation — but the tradeoffs are worth understanding carefully.
The most immediate issue is pipe diameter. The epoxy layer narrows the inside of the pipe, which can reduce water pressure and make undersized pipes even worse. In buildings where low pressure is already a problem, this can be counterproductive.
There are also code and compliance questions. Epoxy jobs sometimes proceed without proper design review and permiting, and the modified pipe system may no longer meet current building codes. This can create permit complications, insurance issues, and problems at resale.
Durability is another concern. Risks include uneven coating thickness, poor adhesion, and damage to valves and fittings. If the coating fails, the building may still need full re-piping down the road — meaning owners pay twice.
As for cost savings, epoxy is often advertised as 35% to 40% less compared to repiping, but in practice the savings are usually closer to 10% to15%.
Feature |
Full Re-Piping |
Epoxy Coating |
| Pipe condition | Brand new | Old pipes remain |
| Pipe diameter | Fully restored | Reduced |
| Code compliance | Fully compliant | Often questioned |
| Lifespan | 50 plus years | Uncertain |
| Insurance approval | Always accepted | Sometimes rejected |
| System Alterations | Can easily work on | Can’t use torches on epoxied copper pipe |
When water pipes start to fail, building owners face two main options; full re-piping or epoxy pipe coating. Both aim to solve aging pipe problems, but they differ significantly in safety, lifespan, and long-term value.
In many cases, the savings are only 10–15%, not the 35–40% often advertised.
Yes. The coating reduces pipe size, which can lower pressure.
Some insurers may reject or limit coverage.
In many cases, the savings are only 10–15%, not the 35–40% often advertised.
For both rental and strata buildings, full repiping is the stronger long-term investment. It delivers proven performance, code compliance, and better resale value. Epoxy coating may seem appealing upfront, but the modest cost savings rarely justify the risks and uncertainties involved.
Drinking water systems need to meet strict safety standards, and long-term reliability matters more than short-term savings.
If your building has aging pipes or you’re weighing these options, a professional evaluation is the best place to start. We provide pipe condition assessments, code compliance reviews, cost comparisons, and long-term planning advice for apartment and strata buildings across Metro Vancouver.
Safe Plumbing. Proven Solutions. Long-Term Protection. Contact us to learn more.